Exploring the law of unintended consequences
From
The Register
Scott Granneman from
SecurityFocus writes:
bq. Back in the 1970s, long before the revolution that would eventually topple him from power, the
Shah of Iran was one of America's best friends (he was a
dictator who
brutally repressed his people, but he was anti-communist, and that made him OK in our book). Wanting to help out a good friend, the United States government agreed to sell Iran the very same
intaglio presses used to print American currency so that the Shah could print his own high quality money for his country. Soon enough, the Shah was the proud owner of some of the best money printing machines in the world, and
beautiful Iranian Rials proceeded to flow off the presses.
bq. All things must come to an end, and the Shah was forced to flee Iran in 1979 when the
Ayatollah Khomeini's rebellion brought theocratic rule to Iran. Everyone reading this undoubtedly knows the terrible events that followed: students took
American embassy workers hostage for over a year as Iran declared America to be the "Great Satan," while evidence of
US complicity in the Shah's oppression of his people became obvious, leading to a break in relations between the two countries that continues to worsen to this day.
bq. During the early 90s, counterfeit $100 bills began to flood the Mideast, eventually spreading around the world. Known as "superbills" or "superdollars" by the US Treasury due to the astounding quality of the forgeries, these $100 bills became a tremendous headache not only for the US and its economy, but also for people all over the world that depend on the surety of American money. Several culprits have been suggested as responsible for the superbills, including North Korea and Syria, but many observers think the real culprit is the most obvious suspect: an Iranian government deeply hostile to the United States... and even worse, an Iranian government possessing the very same printing presses used to create American money.
bq. If you've ever wondered just why American currency was redesigned in the 1990s, now you know. In the 1970s, the US rewarded an ally with a special machine; in the 1990s, the US had to change its money because that ally was no longer an ally, and that special machine was now a weapon used to attack the US's money supply, where it really hurts. As an example of the law of unintended consequences, it's powerful, and it illustrates one of the main results of that law: that those unintended consequences can really bite back when you least expect them.
Scott then segues into present times and riffs on unsecured email, viruses, DRM and all sorts of things that make computers go bump in the night...
Posted by DaveH at January 23, 2005 5:47 PM