Bill at INDC Journal talks about blog traffic and how some weblogs bait the search engines to trap unsuspecting viewers... Here's Bill:
"Debbie Gibson Naked?" Shameless!
Personally, I think that Wizbang's habit of cynically baiting search engines with posts like "Debbie Gibson Naked" is a horribly cheap way to bump up a blog's traffic numbers. As are posts about "Olsen Twins Naked," "Paris Hilton Naked," "Naked Debbie Gibson and Paris Hilton Nudity. With nakedness. And pictures."
Google-baiting is naked manipulation that artificially inflates traffic and strips the good names of women like Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Jessica Alba, Shakira, Charisma Carpenter, Jennifer Garner, Heidi Klum, Catherine Bell, Salma Hayek, Eliza Dukshu, Angelina Jolie, Beyonce Knowles and Angela Lansbury. And sometimes, they even post scandalous free videos or free pictures!
I'm sorry, but the three contributors to Wizbang really are the menage-a-trois of nude, naked sleaze-blogging. Real, live naked traffic whores.
Naked.
You won't ever see that sort of sexual manipulation here; INDC's traffic is all-natural.
Indeeed. Same with Synthstuff -- no cheap tricks like search engine baiting here... Some of Bill's commenters share similar experiences about people who do this: Here's one:
That's why I stopped mentioning felching, female ejaculation, snoballs, Denver omelets, looking for tina, beavers, or any sentence that contains the words "Slowly I mounted Oliver Willis' wet, quivering pussy".
Here is one more:
So what sets a google trap for chicks?
Tide Laundry detergent?
Jimmy Choo and Prada?
Hummels?
The nerve of some people...
