Excellent speech -- really shows what some people get and some people do not.
Since it was written thirty years ago, there are some out of date references but the basic sentiment doesn't ever change (and this is a good thing).
From New Nationalist:
In this complex world, science, the scientific method, and the consequences of the scientific method are central to everything the human race is doing and to wherever we are going. If we blow ourselves up we will do it by the misapplication of science; if we manage to keep from blowing ourselves up, it will be through intelligent application of science. Science fiction is the only form of fiction which takes into account this central force in our lives and futures. Other sorts of fiction, if they notice science at all, simply deplore it � an attitude very chichi in the anti-intellectual atmosphere today. But we will never get out of the mess we are in by wringing our hands.And a bit more:
But why would anyone want to become a naval officer?And one last excerpt:
In the present dismal state of our culture there is little prestige attached to serving your country; recent public opinion polls place military service far down the list.
It can�t be the pay. No one gets rich on the pay. Even a 4-star admiral is paid much less than top executives in other lines. As for lower ranks the typical naval officer finds himself throughout his career just catching up from the unexpected expenses connected with the last change of duty when another change of duty causes a new financial crisis. Then, when he is about fifty, he is passed over and retires. . .but he can�t really retire because he has two kids in college and one still to go. So he has to find a job. . .and discovers that jobs for men his age are scarce and usually don�t pay well.
Working conditions? You�ll spend half your life away from your family. Your working hours? �Six days shalt thou work and do all thou art able; the seventh day the same, and pound the cable.� A forty-hour week is standard for civilians � but not for naval officers. You�ll work that forty-hour week but that�s just a starter. You�ll stand a night watch as well, and duty weekends. Then with every increase in grade your hours get longer � until at last you get a ship of your own and no longer stand watches. Instead you are on duty twenty-four hours a day. . .and you�ll sign your night order book with: �In case of doubt, do not hesitate to call me.�
I don�t know the average week�s work for a naval officer but it�s closer to sixty than to forty. I�m speaking of peacetime, of course. Under war conditions it is whatever hours are necessary � and sleep you grab when you can.
Why would anyone elect a career which is unappreciated, overworked, and underpaid? It can�t be just to wear a pretty uniform. There has to be a better reason.
Today, in the United States, it is popular among self-styled �intellectuals� to sneer at patriotism. They seem to think that it is axiomatic that any civilized man is a pacifist, and they treat the military profession with contempt. �Warmongers� � �Imperialists� � �Hired killers in uniform� � you have all heard such sneers and you will hear them again. One of their favorite quotations is: �Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.�Heinlein was a giant among men. We need more people like him today.
What they never mention is that the man who made that sneering remark was a fat, gluttonous slob who was pursued all his life by a pathological fear of death.
Patriotism is the most practical of all human characteristics.
But in the present decadent atmosphere patriots are often too shy to talk about it � as if it were something shameful or an irrational weakness.
But patriotism is NOT sentimental nonsense. Nor something dreamed up by demagogues. Patriotism is as necessary a part of man�s evolutionary equipment as are his eyes, as useful to the race as eyes are to the individual.
A man who is NOT patriotic is an evolutionary dead end. This is not sentiment but the hardest of logic.
