Hell no - US Military going Green and complying with the UN Agenda 21

Don't have a corroborating source for this so take it with a grain of salt but... From Against All Enemies - two posts. First -- the United States Military Academy at West Point:

West Point's "Green" Officer
Our military is rapidly losing its way. Somehow it believes that celebrating sodomy in the ranks will be beneficial to good order and discipline and that war is an equal opportunity employer. How is going against the Law of Nature as established by our Creator a good thing?

Now we have the introduction of "green" officers at the United States Military Academy with the addition of "Brigade Energy and Environmental" officers and non-commissioned officers to cadet staffs:

"Cadets on the Brigade Energy and Environmental staff will introduce a new insignia to the Corps when they don their cadet uniforms this week. These cadet energy and environmental officers and noncommissioned officers, or E2Os, are tasked with leading the charge on initiatives related to recycling, energy and water conservation at the academy.

The insignia has the chevrons customary to cadet rank. The three rockers below are designed as waves to signify energy and water. It has been decades since the last insignia has been approved for a cadet staff position, and the process took nearly a year before the rank received approval from the Brigade Tactical Department and the Commandant of Cadets." (from West Point Facebook page)

More at the site. Next up is this: the Green Annex:

Proposed "Green Annex" to the US Army Operations Order
Now that West Point has created Energy and Environmental Officers (or "E2Os"), it is time to introduce an Annex to the US Army Operations Order that addresses climate change, sustainable development, and other green issues during the conduct of military operations. Here is the proposed "Annex W: Sustainable Development" to be completed by the Green Officer on the unit's staff.

What follows are JPGs of the three pages of this document (here, here and here) What caught my eye are the following -- Page one, item five:

5. This is a hypothetical document and not an approved change to FM 5-0. It is being used to demonstrate the potential future of military operations under United Nations' Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development related policies.

And Page two, items 3.g. and 3.h.

g. (U) Scheme for Redistribution of Wealth. Address how the operation will support worldwide redistribution of wealth.
h. (U) Military Union Issues. Address all issues as required by collective bargaining agreements. May include : limitations on work hours, mandated rest periods, mandatory vacation periods, and Union dues.

Obviously, the second post is hypothetical and has not been implemented but the idea that it would be put out there in the first place is downright spooky. I am looking through the current FM 5-0 (PDF) and don't see anything there. Still, why was it released to the public. Especially when everything else checks out.