Bush endorsement
Categories:
2 Comments
Search
October 2022
Environment and Climate
AccuWeather
Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Depot
Ice Age Now
ICECAP
Jennifer Marohasy
Solar Cycle 24
Space Weather
Watts Up With That?
Science and Medicine
Junk Science
Life in the Fast Lane
Luboš Motl
Medgadget
Next Big Future
PhysOrg.com
Geek Stuff
Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Don Lancaster's Guru's Lair
Evil Mad Scientist Laboratories
FAIL Blog
Hack a Day
Kevin Kelly - Cool Tools
Neatorama
Slashdot: News for nerds
The Register
The Daily WTF
Comics
Achewood
The Argyle Sweater
Chip Bok
Broadside Cartoons
Day by Day
Dilbert
Medium Large
Michael Ramirez
Prickly City
Tundra
User Friendly
Vexarr
What The Duck
Wondermark
xkcd
NO WAI! WTF?¿?¿
Awkward Family Photos
Cake Wrecks
Not Always Right
Sober in a Nightclub
You Drive What?
Business and Economics
The Austrian Economists
Carpe Diem
Coyote Blog
Photography and Art
Digital Photography Review
DIYPhotography
James Gurney
Joe McNally's Blog
PetaPixel
photo.net
Shorpy
Strobist
The Online Photographer
Blogrolling
A Western Heart
AMCGLTD.COM
American Digest
The AnarchAngel
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Bayou Renaissance Man
Classical Values
Cobb
Cold Fury
David Limbaugh
Defense Technology
Doug Ross @ Journal
Grouchy Old Cripple
Instapundit
iowahawk
Irons in the Fire
James Lileks
Lowering the Bar
Maggie's Farm
Marginal Revolution
Michael J. Totten
Mostly Cajun
Neanderpundit
neo-neocon
Power Line
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Questions and Observations
Rachel Lucas
Roger L. Simon
Samizdata.net
Sense of Events
Sound Politics
The Strata-Sphere
The Smallest Minority
The Volokh Conspiracy
Tim Blair
Velociworld
Weasel Zippers
WILLisms.com
Wizbang
Gone but not Forgotten...
A Coyote at the Dog Show
Bad Eagle
Steven DenBeste
democrats give conservatives indigestion
Allah
BigPictureSmallOffice
Cox and Forkum
The Diplomad
Priorities & Frivolities
Gut Rumbles
Mean Mr. Mustard 2.0
MegaPundit
Masamune
Neptunus Lex
Other Side of Kim
Publicola
Ramblings' Journal
Sgt. Stryker
shining full plate and a good broadsword
A Physicist's Perspective
The Daily Demarche
Wayne's Online Newsletter
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by DaveH published on October 27, 2004 11:10 AM.
Airport "Security" was the previous entry in this blog.
One Year Ago Today... is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- Add category
- Administrivia (9041)
- Anti Environmentalism (53)
- Asshats (894)
- Business (345)
- Climate (1164)
- Critters (157)
- Culture (2009)
- Economics (311)
- Electronics (23)
- Energy (298)
- Environmental (1051)
- Faith (97)
- Farming (250)
- Food (205)
- Geekdom (3936)
- Guns (423)
- Humor (335)
- Interregnum (5)
- Islamofacism (1017)
- Law Enforcement (327)
- Leviathan (6708)
- Local Events (703)
- Media (53)
- Medical Technology (101)
- Medicine and Health (744)
- Middle East (444)
- Military (199)
- Music (341)
- Other... (4062)
- Photography (224)
- Politics (3408)
- Science (1875)
- Seattle (29)
- Tech (48)
- United Nations (43)
- Web Design (15)
- Weblogs (53)
Monthly Archives
- October 2022 (43)
- September 2022 (130)
- August 2022 (90)
- July 2022 (138)
- June 2022 (131)
- May 2022 (170)
- April 2022 (198)
- March 2022 (159)
- February 2022 (176)
- January 2022 (207)
- December 2021 (239)
- November 2021 (205)
- October 2021 (268)
- September 2021 (266)
- August 2021 (355)
- July 2021 (296)
- June 2021 (300)
- May 2021 (266)
- April 2021 (244)
- March 2021 (288)
- February 2021 (299)
- January 2021 (308)
- December 2020 (309)
- November 2020 (299)
- October 2020 (246)
- September 2020 (320)
- August 2020 (345)
- July 2020 (378)
- June 2020 (307)
- May 2020 (378)
- April 2020 (388)
- March 2020 (360)
- February 2020 (244)
- January 2020 (225)
- December 2019 (328)
- November 2019 (382)
- October 2019 (388)
- September 2019 (301)
- August 2019 (278)
- July 2019 (222)
- June 2019 (192)
- May 2019 (186)
- April 2019 (267)
- March 2019 (348)
- February 2019 (327)
- January 2019 (262)
- December 2018 (261)
- November 2018 (271)
- October 2018 (180)
- September 2018 (156)
- August 2018 (159)
- July 2018 (140)
- June 2018 (137)
- May 2018 (132)
- April 2018 (119)
- March 2018 (112)
- February 2018 (138)
- January 2018 (191)
- December 2017 (109)
- November 2017 (138)
- October 2017 (144)
- September 2017 (140)
- August 2017 (172)
- July 2017 (258)
- June 2017 (278)
- May 2017 (268)
- April 2017 (274)
- March 2017 (307)
- February 2017 (283)
- January 2017 (359)
- December 2016 (310)
- November 2016 (285)
- October 2016 (262)
- September 2016 (236)
- August 2016 (278)
- July 2016 (291)
- June 2016 (284)
- May 2016 (268)
- April 2016 (268)
- March 2016 (259)
- February 2016 (200)
- January 2016 (206)
- December 2015 (172)
- November 2015 (190)
- October 2015 (183)
- September 2015 (187)
- August 2015 (183)
- July 2015 (203)
- June 2015 (168)
- May 2015 (180)
- April 2015 (137)
- March 2015 (179)
- February 2015 (158)
- January 2015 (160)
- December 2014 (175)
- November 2014 (163)
- October 2014 (193)
- September 2014 (159)
- August 2014 (155)
- July 2014 (174)
- June 2014 (150)
- May 2014 (165)
- April 2014 (183)
- March 2014 (169)
- February 2014 (174)
- January 2014 (207)
- December 2013 (187)
- November 2013 (148)
- October 2013 (176)
- September 2013 (156)
- August 2013 (151)
- July 2013 (162)
- June 2013 (157)
- May 2013 (156)
- April 2013 (158)
- March 2013 (204)
- February 2013 (168)
- January 2013 (192)
- December 2012 (203)
- November 2012 (194)
- October 2012 (200)
- September 2012 (177)
- August 2012 (153)
- July 2012 (148)
- June 2012 (97)
- May 2012 (118)
- April 2012 (96)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (89)
- January 2012 (87)
- December 2011 (83)
- November 2011 (67)
- October 2011 (49)
- September 2011 (66)
- August 2011 (101)
- July 2011 (96)
- June 2011 (123)
- May 2011 (159)
- April 2011 (153)
- March 2011 (142)
- February 2011 (106)
- January 2011 (149)
- December 2010 (131)
- November 2010 (127)
- October 2010 (131)
- September 2010 (107)
- August 2010 (139)
- July 2010 (132)
- June 2010 (132)
- May 2010 (131)
- April 2010 (164)
- March 2010 (189)
- February 2010 (128)
- January 2010 (159)
- December 2009 (181)
- November 2009 (176)
- October 2009 (141)
- September 2009 (165)
- August 2009 (155)
- July 2009 (161)
- June 2009 (165)
- May 2009 (185)
- April 2009 (188)
- March 2009 (161)
- February 2009 (160)
- January 2009 (175)
- December 2008 (190)
- November 2008 (125)
- October 2008 (160)
- September 2008 (150)
- August 2008 (131)
- July 2008 (104)
- June 2008 (118)
- May 2008 (114)
- April 2008 (155)
- March 2008 (112)
- February 2008 (54)
- January 2008 (122)
- December 2007 (120)
- November 2007 (125)
- October 2007 (62)
- September 2007 (85)
- August 2007 (111)
- July 2007 (100)
- June 2007 (141)
- May 2007 (135)
- April 2007 (107)
- March 2007 (162)
- February 2007 (77)
- January 2007 (98)
- December 2006 (116)
- November 2006 (66)
- October 2006 (72)
- September 2006 (90)
- August 2006 (80)
- July 2006 (45)
- June 2006 (73)
- May 2006 (79)
- April 2006 (111)
- March 2006 (81)
- February 2006 (96)
- January 2006 (173)
- December 2005 (193)
- November 2005 (121)
- October 2005 (121)
- September 2005 (152)
- August 2005 (141)
- July 2005 (139)
- June 2005 (202)
- May 2005 (173)
- April 2005 (124)
- March 2005 (195)
- February 2005 (207)
- January 2005 (224)
- December 2004 (124)
- November 2004 (198)
- October 2004 (186)
- September 2004 (80)
- August 2004 (81)
- July 2004 (25)
- June 2004 (67)
- May 2004 (111)
- April 2004 (225)
- March 2004 (256)
- February 2004 (233)
- January 2004 (314)
- December 2003 (194)
- November 2003 (264)
- October 2003 (34)
The earlier comment is well written and heartfelt but it is based on inaccurate information and comes from someone with a soft view (as in soft-in-the-head) of the Foreign Policy that needs to happen with these people.
Definitly this person did not spend any time seriously reading the text of the blog.
Troll but I will let it stand.
Why I'm Voting Against My Commander in Chief
By David Thalheimer
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Friday 22 October 2004
I have been a registered Republican since I first became eligible to vote. I've been an Air Force officer for 20 years, first on active duty and now in the reserves. I gladly voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and supported his battle to win the Cold War. If called to serve in Iraq, I would willingly do my duty for my country. You might think I'm a slam-dunk for the Republican ticket this year, but you'd be wrong. I backed John McCain in the 2000 primary, but I did not vote for George W. Bush and I'm even more opposed to him after seeing his performance over the past four years. I can't say I'm a big fan of John Kerry, but he's a smart guy and I'm willing to give him a chance because Bush has done such a bad job and shows so few signs of improvement that he doesn't deserve to get reelected. This letter explains why I'm voting against my Commander in Chief.
President Bush would have you believe that he is making hard decisions and doing what needs to be done to win the Global War on Terrorism. While I have no doubt that he is trying, his actions have shown me that his judgment is poor and he and his advisers aren't smart enough to figure out the right way to win this war. Taking out Al Qaida and the Taliban in Afghanistan was a no-brainer, but the invasion of Iraq was a huge diversion of resources away from the real sources of terrorism. Showing the world that we can and will "take out" any country we want may make puny countries like Libya quiver, but it isn't a smart way to beat the terrorists or our real enemies - it plays right into their hands.
Bush has made no real attempt to win the support of the large majority of Muslims who oppose terrorism. Instead, he has created millions of new enemies around the world - people who used to admire the USA - and these people are now more likely to be recruited by or support future terrorists. It is now more likely that they will overthrow their moderate, pro-US governments, such as Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, and replace them with radical Islamic regimes. Far more dangerous to America than Iraq are the radicals trying to take over Pakistan (which already has nuclear weapons), the unpredictable leader of North Korea (which also has nukes), and Iran (which is allegedly working hard to get them). We are less secure today because we are creating more new enemies than we are able to kill or capture. There are smarter ways to track down terrorists and reduce the appeal of radical Islamic ideology, but Bush has decided to take the easy but wrong course of flexing America's conventional military might and intimidating the world rather than rallying our friends and allies around a grand strategy that has a chance of success.
American troops are doing the best they can to win in Iraq, but the decision to go to war and the lack of planning to win the peace were strategic political mistakes made by President Bush, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, and the senior White House staff. The rhetoric coming out of the White House about what is happening in Iraq not only continues to mislead our citizens, but it has misled our own troops. It has caused them to misjudge their enemies and make fatal mistakes in dealing with the Iraqi population. Senior White House decisions also sent the message to our troops that they could get around the Geneva Convention when interrogating suspected terrorists - with disastrous results for the detainees at Abu Gharib prison.
President Bush says he has fully supported his troops, but he is really taking credit for good Congressional support and ignoring his own poor record. He has repeatedly submitted defense budgets cutting active, reserve, guard and veterans' benefits, including imminent danger pay, family separation allowance, and the funding of VA hospitals, only to have them protected by Congress. Attempting to pay for tax cuts by cutting military benefits during wartime is outrageous and damaging to our military families.
While national security is of my most grave concern, there are other domestic issues that also matter and can't be allowed to suffer through another four years of bad policy.
I was recently shocked to learn that President Bush, despite all his talk about love of freedom, has attempted to deny our most precious freedom to American citizens who oppose him - the right to free speech. On many occasions, he has used the Secret Service to keep legal, peaceful protesters quarantined in designated "free speech zones" where nobody (especially the media) can see or hear them. Pro-Bush crowds are allowed to get near him during speeches, but people with signs critical of him have been forcibly moved away or illegally arrested. I find this outrageous and intolerable. Some provisions in the Patriot Act are also dangerous to our liberty in the hands of an attorney general who is willing to jail citizens for months or years without any possibility of judicial review. Many American citizens have been jailed secretly, and while I am all for giving the FBI greater powers to investigate suspected terrorists, there have to be checks and balances to protect us from over-zealous government officials. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and all Americans should be wary of any President who is willing to violate our most basic rights.
While I'm not a fan of extreme environmentalists who want to protect every endangered species around, I do care about the quality of my air and water and controls on toxic waste that could endanger all of our health. I'm willing to pay for healthy living conditions, and I don't think that such costs threaten the competitiveness of US companies against low-cost foreign companies that are allowed to pollute. President Bush has attempted to reverse environmental protections across the board and has given big business interests the ability to profit from the destruction of our natural resources. He forced the EPA to stop prosecuting Clean Air Act violators, attempted to increase the amount of toxic mercury allowed in our water, under-funded the cleanup of hazardous waste, reversed EPA bans on the sale of contaminated land, increased logging in our national parks, allowed giant pig "factory farms" to pollute the land, water and homes without having to clean it up, and ignored the threat of global warming. Yes, it costs money to have healthy living conditions and some countries don't want to pay the price. That's when the President has a duty to lead the world to negotiate good environmental treaties, not to refuse to participate, thus guaranteeing failure. He has a duty to protect American companies against unfair foreign competition, not give them a license to break the laws established to protect our own citizens. President Bush has failed to lead the world and protect our citizens from environmental hazards or unfair foreign competition.
President Bush also appears willing to sacrifice our national parks to the interests of oil companies, strip miners and loggers. Once these national treasures have been exploited, they will be ruined forever. Our parks belong to the people and I'm not willing to sell them out for a few bucks, most of which will go to private companies and the rest of which will go to support more government spending or tax cuts for the wealthy.
Finally, let me address the economy. I've never really believed that the President has much short-term influence over the state of the economy. However, I do know that cutting taxes and increasing spending is normally a great way to stimulate economic growth for a few years, while hurting us in the long-term when we have to pay off the debt. Yet, despite the billions in tax cuts and increased homeland security spending, I haven't seen any growth in jobs or spending. I guess that means all we get is the long-term debt. Finally - is President Bush willing to fix Social Security? No - but then again, I don't think anyone in Washington has the guts to do it.
The bottom line is this. President Bush had four years to show us what he can do. He has completely bungled our foreign policy and has been favoring big business interests and wealthy individuals over fiscal responsibility, the well being of our economy, and the health of our citizens. There is no way he's getting another chance if I have anything to say about it.
Sir, you are relieved of duty!