A bit of a scam - Photography

| 1 Comment
From a Photography email list I found that Crossroads Trading Co. (a New and Used Clothing Store based in CA and Seattle) is offering this wonderful 15th Annual Photo Contest. From their website Contest Announcement:
All amateur and professional photographers are invited to enter Crossroads' 15th Annual Fashion Photo Contest now through June 8, 2008. Winning photos will show the most attractive presentation of currently fashionable clothing. Photographs will also be evaluated on the basis of originality, creativity, composition and overall quality.

ENTER
It's easier than ever to share your fashion vision with the world! To enter, read the official rules, create your account, and upload your photos. Check the tips and guidelines page for details on how to prepare your photos. You'll need to create 2 files from your original: a Thumbnail which must be no longer than 120 pixels on its longest side, and a Fullsize which must be no longer than 800 pixels on its longest side. Make those in JPG format, in RGB mode, 72dpi.
Sounds like fun and a good way for a beginning pro to get some exposure. But... Excerpted from the Photographers Agreement: (PDF File)
I hereby transfer all ownership and copyright of the photograph(s) to CROSSROADS TRADING CO., INC. I understand that this means that Crossroads Trading Co., Inc. will have the sole right to publish such photograph(s) in any manner they chose.
And the prizes:
PRIZES
1st Place: $1000.00 Cash + Publication of Photograph with credits as part of a CTC ad campaign + 24� x 36" poster of your winning entry, on archival paper.

2nd Place: $300.00 Cash + Likely publication of photograph with credits as part of a CTC ad campaign + 24� x 36" poster of your winning entry, on archival paper.

3rd Place: $150.00 Cash + Possible publication of photograph with credits as part of a CTC ad campaign + 11� x 17" poster of your winning entry, on archival paper.

Honorable Mentions: $50.00 Cash + Possible publication of photograph with credits as part of a CTC ad campaign.
I bet they have maybe two or three Honorable Mentions so for a grand total of $1,500 plus the cost of a couple large prints ($300 tops - an operation that size will have in-house large format printers), they get a virtually unlimited stream of glamour photographs of models wearing cool clothes. The photographers don't have to use any particular line of clothing because this is a new and used clothing store. And for the poor schlub that thinks they will be getting exposure? Only the five or six cash prize winners will get any kind of credit for their work. It's all legal and above board but I pity the poor fool who works for free. Been there, done that...

1 Comment

I fully agree with you that their terms are extremely unfair. I have a problem with them having the sole right to publish someone's work without having paid for it. However, California law says in order for a contract to be valid there must be "consideration." Meaning if Crossroads decides to use one of those images that they didn't pay for, the contract would be null as the photographer would not have received payment for their images. Courts also have a history of not upholding contracts that were created unfairly.

All in all, there are legal ways around such unfair terms.

Leave a comment

October 2022

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

Environment and Climate
AccuWeather
Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Depot
Ice Age Now
ICECAP
Jennifer Marohasy
Solar Cycle 24
Space Weather
Watts Up With That?


Science and Medicine
Junk Science
Life in the Fast Lane
Luboš Motl
Medgadget
Next Big Future
PhysOrg.com


Geek Stuff
Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Don Lancaster's Guru's Lair
Evil Mad Scientist Laboratories
FAIL Blog
Hack a Day
Kevin Kelly - Cool Tools
Neatorama
Slashdot: News for nerds
The Register
The Daily WTF


Comics
Achewood
The Argyle Sweater
Chip Bok
Broadside Cartoons
Day by Day
Dilbert
Medium Large
Michael Ramirez
Prickly City
Tundra
User Friendly
Vexarr
What The Duck
Wondermark
xkcd


NO WAI! WTF?¿?¿
Awkward Family Photos
Cake Wrecks
Not Always Right
Sober in a Nightclub
You Drive What?


Business and Economics
The Austrian Economists
Carpe Diem
Coyote Blog


Photography and Art
Digital Photography Review
DIYPhotography
James Gurney
Joe McNally's Blog
PetaPixel
photo.net
Shorpy
Strobist
The Online Photographer


Blogrolling
A Western Heart
AMCGLTD.COM
American Digest
The AnarchAngel
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Babalu Blog
Belmont Club
Bayou Renaissance Man
Classical Values
Cobb
Cold Fury
David Limbaugh
Defense Technology
Doug Ross @ Journal
Grouchy Old Cripple
Instapundit
iowahawk
Irons in the Fire
James Lileks
Lowering the Bar
Maggie's Farm
Marginal Revolution
Michael J. Totten
Mostly Cajun
Neanderpundit
neo-neocon
Power Line
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Questions and Observations
Rachel Lucas
Roger L. Simon
Samizdata.net
Sense of Events
Sound Politics
The Strata-Sphere
The Smallest Minority
The Volokh Conspiracy
Tim Blair
Velociworld
Weasel Zippers
WILLisms.com
Wizbang


Gone but not Forgotten...
A Coyote at the Dog Show
Bad Eagle
Steven DenBeste
democrats give conservatives indigestion
Allah
BigPictureSmallOffice
Cox and Forkum
The Diplomad
Priorities & Frivolities
Gut Rumbles
Mean Mr. Mustard 2.0
MegaPundit
Masamune
Neptunus Lex
Other Side of Kim
Publicola
Ramblings' Journal
Sgt. Stryker
shining full plate and a good broadsword
A Physicist's Perspective
The Daily Demarche
Wayne's Online Newsletter

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by DaveH published on April 21, 2008 11:17 PM.

A fatal case of localization was the previous entry in this blog.

Very light posting today is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.2.9