Another one sees the light - AGW meet Without Hot Air -dot- com

Hat tip to The Register for this link to Without Hot Air dot com. From The Register:

Heavyweight physics prof weighs into climate/energy scrap
Analysis A topflight science brainbox at Cambridge University has weighed into the ever-louder and more unruly climate/energy debate with several things that so far have been mostly lacking: hard numbers, willingness to upset all sides, and an attempt to see whether the various agendas put forward would actually stack up.

Professor David J C MacKay of the Cambridge University Department of Physics holds a PhD in computation from Cal Tech and a starred first in Physics, so we can take it that he knows his numbers. And, as he points out, numbers are typically lacking in current discussion around carbon emissions and energy use.

MacKay tells The Reg that he was first drawn into this field by the constant suggestion � from the Beeb, parts of the government etc � that we can seriously impact our personal energy consumption by doing such things as turning our TVs off standby or unplugging our mobile-phone chargers.

Anyone with even a slight grasp of energy units should know that this is madness. Skipping one bath saves a much energy as leaving your TV off standby for over six months. People who wash regularly, wear clean clothes, consume hot food or drink, use powered transport of any kind and live in warm houses have no need to worry about the energy they use to power their electronics; it�s insignificant compared to the other things.

Most of us don�t see basic hygiene, decent food and warm houses as sinful luxuries, but as things we can reasonably expect to have. This means that society as a whole needs a lot of energy, which led MacKay to consider how this might realistically be supplied in a low-carbon fashion. He�s coming at the issues from a green/ecological viewpoint, but climate-change sceptics who are nonetheless concerned about Blighty becoming dependent on Russian gas and Saudi oil � as the North Sea starts to play out � will also find his analysis interesting. Eliminating carbon largely equates to eliminating gas and oil use.

�I don�t really mind too much what your plan is,� MacKay told The Reg this week. �But it�s got to add up.�

He says he�s largely letting his machine-learning lab at Cambridge run itself these days, and is personally spending most of his time on trying out different energy scenarios.

MacKay sets out his calculations in a book, Sustainable Energy � Without the hot air. You can download it here.

You can bet that I'll be spending some time over the next week or so reading this draft. It's a 13 MB PDF file with another webpage with links to the citations. Looks well researched and very toxic to the AGW evangelists like the Goreacle...