The "Science" behind Global Warming

One of the things that gets my goat about Anthropogenic Global Warming is that none of the "models" can hindcast worth a damn. We have several hundred years of good and solid climactic history and plugging those numbers into the models turns up predictions completely at odds with what actually happened. That is long term, the gurus of bad science are claiming their model works on short-term predictions as well. Guess what... From the Daily Bayonet:

A 'very rare and exciting event' covers the UK in global warming
A global warming prediction from Climategate central, the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia:

According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will become �a very rare and exciting event�.

�Children just aren�t going to know what snow is,� he said.

That prediction was made ten years ago, in 2000.

Unfortunately for Dr. Viner and the motley CRU, the Internet never forgets and as the UK enters its third straight year of deep cold and early snow with its earliest snowfall in 17 years, the alarmist doom-saying nonsense is exposed for all to see.

More at the site. Even if the climate "scientists" got things right fifty percent of the time, I would give them some pittance of probability but they have been dead wrong more often than not...