Maybe that will confuse the general public enough that they will get excited again. From the AAAS Science journal:
Let's Call It 'Climate Disruption,' White House Science Adviser Suggests (Again)First there was “global warming.” Then many researchers suggested “climate change” was a better term. Now, White House science adviser John Holdren is renewing his call for a new nomenclature to describe the end result of dumping vast quantities of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases into Earth’s atmosphere: “global climate disruption.”
“I’ve always thought that the phrase ‘global warming’ was something of a misnomer because it suggests that the phenomenon is something that is uniform around the world, that it’s all about temperature, and that it’s gradual,” Holdren said yesterday at the annual AAAS Forum on Science and Technology Policy in Washington, D.C. (AAAS publishes ScienceInsider.) “What could be wrong with that?”
As though Carbon Dioxide was a bad thing. Just another silly Malthusian.
And not to forget that Holdren has been trying this crap for almost five years. From this September 16, 2010 FOX News article:
White House: Global Warming Out, 'Global Climate Disruption' InFrom the administration that brought you "man-caused disaster" and "overseas contingency operation," another terminology change is in the pipeline.
The White House wants the public to start using the term "global climate disruption" in place of "global warming" -- fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.
White House science adviser John Holdren urged people to start using the phrase during a speech last week in Oslo, echoing a plea he made three years earlier. Holdren said global warming is a "dangerous misnomer" for a problem far more complicated than a rise in temperature.
What a putz -- he is not a scientist, he is an activist pushing a political agenda.
Leave a comment