Khizr Khan - a Gold Star father (his son was a US Soldier and died in combat) appeared at the Democratic National Convention criticizing Donald Trump. Everyone focused on Kahn's criticisms but now people are starting to look at Kahn himself and there is a lot to see.
Last evening, I posted about how in the tank for Hillary he was having "deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation."
And now he has deleted his law practice website - fortunately, there is the Internet Archive
From Breitbart:
Panic Mode: Khizr Khan Deletes Law Firm Website that Specialized in Muslim Immigration
Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that Democrats and their allies media wide have been using to hammer GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump, has deleted his law firm’s website from the Internet.
This development is significant, as his website proved—as Breitbart News and others have reported—that he financially benefits from unfettered pay-to-play Muslim migration into America.
A snapshot of his now deleted website, as captured by the Wayback Machine which takes snapshots archiving various websites on the Internet, shows that as a lawyer he engages in procurement of EB5 immigration visas and other “Related Immigration Services.”
The website is completely removed from the Internet, and instead directs visitors to the URL at which it once was to a page parking the URL run by GoDaddy.
And from The Daily Caller:
Khizr Khan Has Written Extensively On Sharia Law
Khizr Khan, the Muslim father of a slain American soldier, is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sunnah over all other texts and interpretations.
Khan rose to fame after speaking at the Democratic National Convention Thursday and pulling out a pocket U.S. Constitution imploring if Donald Trump had even read it.
Khan wrote “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law” in the Houston Journal of International Law in 1983. In it he breaks down different levels of Islamic law. Khan writes that the Quran and the Sunnah which were both directly created by the Muslim prophet Muhammad were the only sources in Muhammad’s lifetime that “were recognized as binding.”
Recognized as binding... How binding?
All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.
Sounds like we have a rat in our grain. Kahn is no friend of the United States, no follower of religious freedom. He considers something written by the false prophet to be binding and not open to interpretation. What does he think of our Constitution? The Bill of Rights? And he is licensed to practice law?
To think that he had the unmitigated gall to hold a pocket copy of the US Constitution to make a point during his speech...
Leave a comment