First from Debra Heine writing at PJ Media:
Judge Napolitano: Election Fraud in Detroit Looks 'Organized, and Government Involved'
Jill Stein's recount efforts in Michigan have uncovered what looks like systemic election fraud in Detroit, where roughly 95% of the votes cast were cast for Hillary Clinton. Sixty percent of precincts in Wayne County had to be disqualified from the statewide recount because of "irregularities." According to Fox News judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano, those irregularities look "organized" and "government involved."
County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News after ballot irregularities were discovered revealed that 37 percent of Detroit precincts registered more votes than voters during the election.
Second, from Jazz Shaw writing at Hot Air:
Michigan’s electoral integrity problems weren’t in Trump country
Earlier today, Ed examined the question of just what went so wrong for Hillary Clinton in Michigan on November 8th. Clearly a case can be made that Secretary Clinton failed to invest enough effort in securing the state and likely was taking it for granted, but that doesn’t mean that somebody wasn’t trying very, very hard to make sure she won. It’s going to be difficult to draw in absolute line from Point A to Point B, but some of the voting machines around the Detroit area were acting in what could only be described as a very peculiar fashion. In fact, in almost 250 Wayne County precincts, the optical scanner style voting machines recorded more votes than were actually cast. (Detroit News)
Jazz concludes with the following:
While there isn’t enough data yet to be definitive, I’ll be the one to just come out and say it. This was too much “error” to simply be ascribed to a software glitch and it was centered in a Democratic stronghold in the state. If they actually do a full balance sheet for all of those machines and it turns out that they were overcounting in favor of Trump I’ll happily buy donuts and coffee for the first person to challenge this assertion.
And if you’re among the crowd who keeps telling me that voter fraud isn’t real or at least is so rare that it never affects the outcome of an election, keep a bookmark on this case. Remember that Trump only won the state by a bit more than 10,000 votes. The reality may turn out to be that he actually won by considerably more but Clinton’s totals were being fluffed up around Detroit. And what if another 250 precincts had turned out to be “malfunctioning” in this fashion? You can make up 10K votes pretty fast with roughly one thousand machines. Hillary might have wound up “winning” Michigan in that event and the national electoral vote count would have been considerably closer, possibly spurring even more heated efforts at other recounts and challenges. Think about it.
Why is it that the Democrats always have to cheat on elections - they do not have ideas that stand on their own merit.
Leave a comment